From the Right

/

Politics

Yes, Bring Back The Woolly Mammoth

By Rich Lowry on

We have the dire wolf again.

Thanks to the heroic work of Colossal Biosciences, the canine species that went extinct more than 10,000 years ago has been revived in a stunning act of so-called de-extinction.

The dire wolf is a bit of a Late Pleistocene celebrity thanks to its role in the "Game of Throne" series as a symbol of the Stark family.

What's happening on the company's 2,000-acre enclosure isn't worthy of that fantasy book and HBO series, although it naturally brings to mind the blockbuster "Jurassic Park," where a similar project inadvertently looses rampaging dinosaurs on a remote island.

Ian Malcolm, the scientist who warns about the unpredictability of nature in the movie, was unavailable for comment.

In this instance, maybe he'd simply marvel at what's been accomplished, and he'd be right.

Colossal got samples of dire wolf DNA from fossils and edited the DNA of gray wolves to add key characteristics of the extinct species. The Dallas-based company then created modified embryos and implanted them in surrogate dogs. Now, three young dire wolves -- or, to be more precise, near-dire wolves -- are living in an undisclosed location.

The two males are named, inevitably, Romulus and Remus, while the female is called Khaleesi, after a character in "Game of Thrones."

They are recognizably dire wolves. A reporter for Time magazine notes, compared to the common gray wolf, they have a "white coat, larger size, more powerful shoulders, wider head, larger teeth and jaws, more-muscular legs, and characteristic vocalizations, especially howling and whining."

Colossal wants to do for the dodo, Tasmanian tiger and the woolly mammoth what it's done for the dire wolf, and why not?

The woolly mammoth, the foremost charismatic megaherbivore, would be the prize of this list, and, one assumes, come closest to producing the slack-jawed wonder of the characters in "Jurassic Park" when they first see giant reptiles walking the Earth again.

To be sure, none of this is an assured success. The dire wolf juveniles will be closely monitored during their lives for unpredicted problems. They are a long way from being introduced into the wild, and then there's the issue that the big mammals that were their prey -- including woolly mammoths -- are no longer around, either.

 

That there are obstacles -- including, in the case of woolly mammoths, a nearly two-year gestation period in a surrogate elephant -- doesn't mean we should credit the opponents of the project. One naysaying philosopher warns that modern-day woolly mammoths may have "potential psychological and behavioral deficits."

Really? Members of a miraculously resurrected species might have behavioral problems? This is a little like saying humans shouldn't go to Mars because someone might leave an empty Coke bottle on the surface of the Red Planet.

A writer at Vox worries about the nonvoluntary surrogacy for mother elephants, potential miscarriages and risky C-sections.

The sad fact is that much of environmentalism is beholden to an overwhelmingly negative worldview where everything but doomsday warnings of the effects of global warming is unwelcome, especially any technological advance that doesn't accord with its ideology.

It's certainly true that, in some cases, we want species for utilitarian reasons to maintain an ecological balance, but we also want diverse species for the wonder of them. The planet would survive without blue whales, but we'd feel poorer without them. By the same token, wouldn't a return of woolly mammoths enrich our planet?

After we hurried another potential target for de-extinction, the passenger pigeon, out of existence, we should have a lot of time for the impulse to, through sheer human ingenuity, bring it back.

If all this feels like hubris, so does all of modernity. Who thought we could create a palm-size supercomputer, or forge any of the medical and technological advances that define our world?

"Life, uh, finds a way," Ian Malcolm famously says in the movie. So it does, which is why we have dire wolves when there were none for millennia.

========

(Rich Lowry is on Twitter @RichLowry)

(c) 2025 by King Features Syndicate


 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Related Channels

Armstrong Williams

Armstrong Williams

By Armstrong Williams
Austin Bay

Austin Bay

By Austin Bay
Ben Shapiro

Ben Shapiro

By Ben Shapiro
Betsy McCaughey

Betsy McCaughey

By Betsy McCaughey
Cal Thomas

Cal Thomas

By Cal Thomas
Christine Flowers

Christine Flowers

By Christine Flowers
David Harsanyi

David Harsanyi

By David Harsanyi
Debra Saunders

Debra Saunders

By Debra Saunders
Dennis Prager

Dennis Prager

By Dennis Prager
Erick Erickson

Erick Erickson

By Erick Erickson
John Stossel

John Stossel

By John Stossel
Josh Hammer

Josh Hammer

By Josh Hammer
Judge Andrew Napolitano

Judge Andrew Napolitano

By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
Laura Hollis

Laura Hollis

By Laura Hollis
Michael Barone

Michael Barone

By Michael Barone
Michael Reagan

Michael Reagan

By Michael Reagan
Mona Charen

Mona Charen

By Mona Charen
Oliver North and David L. Goetsch

Oliver North and David L. Goetsch

By Oliver North and David L. Goetsch
R. Emmett Tyrrell

R. Emmett Tyrrell

By R. Emmett Tyrrell
Rachel Marsden

Rachel Marsden

By Rachel Marsden
Ruben Navarrett Jr

Ruben Navarrett Jr

By Ruben Navarrett Jr.
S.E. Cupp

S.E. Cupp

By S.E. Cupp
Salena Zito

Salena Zito

By Salena Zito
Star Parker

Star Parker

By Star Parker
Stephen Moore

Stephen Moore

By Stephen Moore
Terence P. Jeffrey

Terence P. Jeffrey

By Terence P. Jeffrey
Tim Graham

Tim Graham

By Tim Graham
Veronique de Rugy

Veronique de Rugy

By Veronique de Rugy
Victor Joecks

Victor Joecks

By Victor Joecks
Wayne Allyn Root

Wayne Allyn Root

By Wayne Allyn Root

Comics

Bob Englehart Andy Marlette Jack Ohman Chris Britt Adam Zyglis Chip Bok